Solf J Kimblee (
explosivecombat) wrote2012-10-04 01:10 am
Entry tags:
NIETZSCHE; DEAD PHILOSOPHERS' INBOX
The offer for conversation is always open, should you desire to take me up on it; I can't guarantee that I'll respond immediately, nor will it necessarily be the response you want, but I'll always respond in some way.
In the name of enlightened discourse.

no subject
no subject
no subject
I owe you that, too.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I know what I'm supposed to be working on; it's a process, that's all.
no subject
Can we start with that?
no subject
no subject
...That's why it's confusing.
no subject
no subject
You were furious and now you're not. I've...got that much straight, to start with?
no subject
no subject
no subject
...We resolved the issue, didn't we?
no subject
Well...yes, but that doesn't...
[. . .]
So you were only furious as long as the issue was ongoing, but now that it's been...dealt with, you've stopped being so — having reason to be so, maybe — and are back to the status quo. Something like that?
no subject
no subject
It...usually takes a while to come down off of it, in most people's experience. Certainly in mine.
no subject
I think the only times that doesn't fully work is when I'm angry at someone and they don't do as I expect them to do; that tends to be oddly unsatisfying and I don't care for it very much. In general, though, if I don't have any argument with someone or something, then I simply don't, and the anger tends to leave quickly.
no subject
no subject
Do you have any further questions of your own? I'm assuming that's the case, but I want it verified; I don't mind them, if you do.
no subject
This isn't...easy.
no subject
no subject
If you stop being angry about something once it's resolved — naturally you don't forget about it, because you never forget. So...if it comes up again later, when you're angry again, is it...
I can think of three explanations. Either 1) you've rekindled your old anger for the thing and are now angry about it again, 2) the existence of the old thing has contributed to your current anger about the new thing, but were it not for the new thing already making you angry, you wouldn't be angry about the old, or 3) you're not angry about it at all, but it's useful to throw at someone in the heat of a fight.
Are any of those close, or am I overthinking things again?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)