explosivecombat: (Rather strong physical disadvantages)
Solf J Kimblee ([personal profile] explosivecombat) wrote2015-01-19 07:16 pm

040. [Text/Action for Route 34]

[TEXT]

As a former soldier, I've had to consider and handle the question of when it's considered acceptable to take another life. It's hardly a question here, since in this world life is incredibly well-protected and death is incredibly cheap; however, seeing as this place hasn't just dissolved into an anarchic killing spree, it seems that most of us still have a basic grasp on morality as we understand it and are of the basic consensus that "murder is bad."

I suppose my question then is where the line is, for most of the people here, and where the difference lies between murder and self-defense. There's the obvious understanding that if someone is trying to kill you, you likely won't just stand there and let them do it; you're probably going to defend yourself or even fight back, no matter how much of a pacifist you are.

But surely there are places where the criteria becomes a bit more difficult to discern...? Say that you have two people drowning in the ocean; there's a plank nearby that will support the weight of one of them. Without use of the plank, both people will surely die. Person A gets there first, but Person B shoves them off, saving themselves but causing Person A to drown in the process.

Was what Person B did murder? Probably. But they were also going to die if they didn't do it – isn't that just another form of self-defense?

What if Person A fought back and was able to hold their position? That's self-defense, in all probability – but they're also deliberately ensuring the death of another person. Is Person A a murderer for doing so?

Does it matter? Either way, a person is dead because someone else valued their own life more. A life is over and somehow I doubt whatever words the living use to make themselves feel better matter much to the deceased.

...I suppose now is when I apologize for the morbidity of the subject matter, although honestly it seems I can't let a year pass in which I don't ask some sort of horribly inappropriate question about murder. I suppose I'm just getting it out of the way early this year.




[ACTION]

[...And in contrast to that self-admitted horribly inappropriate question about murder, Kimblee actually is doing rather well today; if anything, he seems pleased that the weather has broken and it was above freezing for a few blessed moments today, since that means he can actually go outside and not spend most of his time shut in the base. It's large enough to keep him from getting too worked up, but it's still windowless and claustrophobic and if he can be outside, then dammit, he will be outside.

He's just outside Goldenrod today; he's up on Acasta.

It's been a while since he's done anything from up on top of the Steelix – travel is one thing, but battle is another entirely, and he's got some of his other high-leveled Pokémon out with him for the sake of satisfying that latter desire; Acasta's up against Carlisle right now, and from the look of it, it's not so much Kimblee's job to command as it is to not fall right the hell off. But his balance is good and his gaze is incredibly focused, and from the sound of it, he's having a grand time – he's laughing quite a bit, and it's cold and there's entirely too much ice around and he's done this before and it was a good time then, too.

He manages to jump down when a well-timed Earthquake finally takes Acasta out, ensuring that he's well clear of the steelsnake when it falls; apparently he's not having fun unless everyone stands a great chance of dying, and today isn't much of an exception. At least he'll be unoccupied with battle for a while as he spends a while seeking out a Revive that he has somewhere on his person; whether he's going back up later or just doesn't want to leave Acasta unconscious is a bit hard to say, but either way he's around for conversation.]
throatwash: (pic#8737333)

video;

[personal profile] throatwash 2015-01-20 04:49 am (UTC)(link)
Well... Murder is a word that defines killing as unlawful within certain legal parameters. The difference between murder and self defense, then, is criteria. So is the law based on collective morals, or are collective morals based on the law? It sounds pedantic, but because of the close association between the two, the argument is skewed to support self defense. Most people think unlawfulness is bad. Or in the case of murder, evil. Which classifies their will to survive as evil. That's difficult for many people to admit.

( what a punk. )
throatwash: (pic#8737364)

permavideo; sorry for the delay! i had to think hahaha.

[personal profile] throatwash 2015-01-24 04:34 am (UTC)(link)
( armin considers. that isn't all of his argument, not close to a sliver because he has enough feelings as relating to morals and murder to power a star, but would he want to listen to the long speech on the tip of his tongue? ...well, perhaps if he weren't tired, and shaken, and his skin weren't itching in an imagined panic for each tree he passes. this world is strange. armin realizes he was quick to respond for familiarness in a fellow soldier. )

Mm, I think I got carried away. It's a very personal subject, but I'm certain you got a lot of answers because of that.
throatwash: (pic#8737317)

SORRY omg wrong journal.........

[personal profile] throatwash 2015-02-01 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)
It wasn't my intention to do that. What I was trying to say is I think... ( how do words form?? genuine, though, ) I think a lot needs to be considered when asking and answering questions like this.