explosivecombat: (And what have we here?)
Solf J Kimblee ([personal profile] explosivecombat) wrote2014-10-20 03:32 pm

037. [Text]

I come seeking discussion again today, which to most of you should probably be nothing new; if anything, I ought to apologize for it, but I suspect that will ring about as true as my usual apologies for the subject matter. For what it's worth, the subject is better than it usually is; take that as you will.

I'd like to discuss dreams today; I'm sure those that were here about a year ago know exactly why, but in the end that is neither here nor there, and you don't have to have experienced it to discuss this with me.

I'm sure we're all no strangers to very vivid dreams...? The sort that immerse you so entirely that they almost seem real...surely there are a few qualities here and there that mark them as dreams, but they're disregarded in favor of whatever is actually happening right in front of you. Dreams like that can hardly be said to be different from reality, can they? They invoke feelings within you; they encourage you to continue thinking about them long after you've awakened. You could even say that dreams like that have given you experiences that you might never have had, were you awake – you've gone on adventures and met people and done things that affected you, all while physically being asleep.

Say that there was a way to live like that forever.

Suppose that there's a machine that will put you under, rendering you solidly asleep and allowing you to experience whatever you want. The machine can simulate any pleasurable experience that you choose, instilling all the thoughts and feelings that would come with actually going out and doing those things for yourself in your waking life. There would be no pain or suffering; it would be an experience in pure bliss for as long as you were plugged into the machine.

Again, you could stay that way forever, if you so chose, living out the rest of your life in dreams, and it would be a pleasant experience that's custom-tailored to you. The only tradeoff is that you would be unconscious the entire time; the experience would be entirely in your mind, rather than anything you actually did.

Would you choose to go under and live the rest of your life happy but effectively comatose, or would you prefer to experience life for yourself, entirely awake, with all the imperfections and strife that may come with it?

You can answer me anonymously if you wish, because as usual, your identity doesn't interest me as much as your response does; if you really want to impress me, you'll tell me why you would answer as you did.
doitrockapella: (BOW ❖ holy shit was that an honorific)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-10-21 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
It's been almost a year since I first saw what your alchemy looks like, hasn't it?

I'm assuming that plays a large part in those dreams.
doitrockapella: (LOOK ❖ god lee stop being such a tool)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-10-21 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
Is it like that for all alchemists? Given that part of using alchemy is a certain measure of imagination, I wonder if it's typical for it also to be connected to dreams that way.
doitrockapella: (VAN GOGH ❖ more like van gone amirite)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-10-21 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
So would it be an eternal Ishval for you, if you took the option offered by the machine?
doitrockapella: (BEHIND ❖ driver picks the music)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-10-21 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
You never did tell me if I got it right, you know.
doitrockapella: (DUH ❖ it's called a royale with cheese)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-10-21 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
The things you do let you see how others respond. Wanting to see how people think, wanting to see...I suppose in the case of the war, wanting to see who proves their right to survive, isn't it?

...So if that's the case, then having it all in your head wouldn't mean anything. It's a farce because there's no one else in it but yourself.
doitrockapella: (CONFIDENT ❖ why yes i speak jive)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-10-21 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
You're not offended that I'd considered you might go the other way, are you?
Edited (CLARITY, ALEX) 2014-10-21 01:48 (UTC)
doitrockapella: (BOW ❖ holy shit was that an honorific)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-10-21 02:01 am (UTC)(link)
I know how you like me to show my work.

...You know, if things hold true to form, we're due to have another three-day blackout next month.
doitrockapella: (FOND ❖ oh cute a penguin joke)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-10-21 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
...Come to think of it, I've never really told you about my intellectual rivals back home, have I? I suppose in a way I could also call them my successors. I don't...usually talk about them, the way I bring up some of my others.

Unlikely as it is, I wouldn't mind seeing both or either of them again. It's been two and a half years since I last gave them the slip.

Speaking of other people making the work worthwhile, that is.
doitrockapella: (TRIUMPH ❖ i win again player)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-10-21 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
They're the namesakes of Kant and his sister. I suppose that says something about me, that I named my first three Pokemon after the three people who've been trying to arrest me for years now.

Maybe this time, instead of jumping off of the building, we can try leaping to the top of one, instead.
doitrockapella: (DEADPAN ❖ would you like a hint)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-10-21 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
Would that be all right with you?
doitrockapella: (BOW ❖ holy shit was that an honorific)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-10-21 03:35 am (UTC)(link)
You brought it up; I would assume you'd have some reason for it.

Besides, it only seems polite to ask, considering that particular visitor.
doitrockapella: (VAN GOGH ❖ more like van gone amirite)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-10-21 03:54 am (UTC)(link)
He usually notices that, too. Once, he asked why I looked so sad.

I think what tends to upset me most is never knowing whether I should tell him or not, what he's in for someday. He'll say sometimes that it wouldn't bother him to know and if it'd make me feel better then I should go ahead, but...I never know which is worse, the thought of making him live with knowing — even if it's only for a few days — or keeping it secret from him while he knows full well that I have one.
doitrockapella: (REVEAL ❖ it's everything and nothing)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-10-21 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
I honestly don't know. I'm a little concerned that it'd depend on how much he decided he wanted to know, and how persistent he was in trying to find out.

Even if I tried to keep it to a bare minimum, how would it sound? He's always so eager about his assignment, and I already know how it's going to end for him.

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-10-21 04:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-10-21 17:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-10-21 18:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-10-21 18:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-10-21 18:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-10-21 18:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-10-21 19:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-10-21 20:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-10-21 20:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-10-21 20:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-10-21 20:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-10-21 21:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-10-21 22:32 (UTC) - Expand