explosivecombat: (Gentlemen...I love war)
Solf J Kimblee ([personal profile] explosivecombat) wrote2012-10-04 01:10 am
Entry tags:

NIETZSCHE; DEAD PHILOSOPHERS' INBOX

[TEXT; LOCKED TO [personal profile] doitrockapella]

The offer for conversation is always open, should you desire to take me up on it; I can't guarantee that I'll respond immediately, nor will it necessarily be the response you want, but I'll always respond in some way.

In the name of enlightened discourse.
doitrockapella: (WIND ❖ surely there are aliems about)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2013-07-28 07:02 am (UTC)(link)
I wonder if he would've wanted to.

As for me, I understand you better now. And I'd love you less for it — if I ever had in the first place.
doitrockapella: (POSE ❖ standing atop all the things)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2013-07-28 07:13 am (UTC)(link)
I warned you I'd ask where I fell on your scale. Are you willing to tell me?
doitrockapella: (REVEAL ❖ it's everything and nothing)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2013-07-28 07:23 am (UTC)(link)
Because I can care about you without loving you, and I can want better for you without pitying you.

And if somehow having me around makes your existence more bearable, then I want to know about it so I can keep doing it, and take steps to make sure I don't accidentally take that away from you without good reason.
doitrockapella: (DUH ❖ it's called a royale with cheese)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2013-07-28 08:05 am (UTC)(link)
Because it's overwhelmingly selfish on my part. You know full well every ulterior motive I have for keeping you placated and defused. It's completely in my self-interest to keep a lid on you, and you've just made it known to me tonight that apparently the one person you've ever found who did that job better than anyone else has up and disappeared.

You don't want this to influence our interactions? If anything, this maintains our status quo, because I'm rarely a good conversationalist when I wake up in the middle of the night to find you're overstimulated and blowing things to kingdom come, and the more that happens, the less likely I am to want to keep associating with you anyway. That's not a threat; that's simple rational logic. I don't like you when you're upset, you don't make the experience of being overstimulated sound pleasant at all, and so frankly I don't see why it isn't completely in both our interests to find an arrangement, if one exists, to keep that from happening.

I think you would read what I think of as "love" as the highest form of pity. But I told you that's not what I'm offering. I want an arrangement, a bargain, a negotiation. The fact that I'm allowed to like you while I do it is a separate consideration entirely.
doitrockapella: (DUH ❖ it's called a royale with cheese)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2013-07-28 09:03 am (UTC)(link)
[Only if you grant her about ten of her own because she needs it after that one. Given that her hands are probably shaking bad enough that her texting would come out riddled with typos if she tried it before settling down.]

Then in the interest of candor, let me clarify something I said as bluntly as I can. I have many motives when it comes to dealing with you. Most of them are ones that have nothing to do with our relationship and everything to do with keeping you under some semblance of control — as much as I can hope to exercise over the things you do from the position I'm sitting in, anyway.

But at least one of those motives is that I genuinely like...this. You. I don't always like acknowledging that because I know what you are and what you've done, and you're always quick to remind me of it if it starts to look like I'm forgetting it. But you're important, and that means I don't like it when I'm told there's a problem and I haven't at least tried to fix it.

It's not pity — no, I amend that. It's not intentional pity. If I feel bad, it's because that's who I am, and if I try to fix it, it's partly for you but it's just as much for me. Because when the problem is fixed, then I'll stop feeling bad myself.

That's my explanation. It's more of a confession than I otherwise would've liked, but in the interest of equivalent exchange, I probably owe you that much, at least.
doitrockapella: (VAN GOGH ❖ more like van gone amirite)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2013-07-28 09:31 am (UTC)(link)
I was operating under the impression that if I said I wasn't going to say anything pitying or insipid, that would be taken as clarification that if for some reason I did say something that came off that way, then the problem was in my phrasing creating false implications, not in my intent itself.

I respect you too much to pity you, you know.
doitrockapella: (READ ❖ this is not a demyx impression)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2013-07-28 09:40 am (UTC)(link)
I respect my teachers, and I respect the people who change me, for better or for worse.

You're both. For better or for worse.
doitrockapella: (BOW ❖ holy shit was that an honorific)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2013-07-28 09:54 am (UTC)(link)
What am I going to wake up to tomorrow, if I do?
doitrockapella: (REVEAL ❖ it's everything and nothing)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2013-07-28 08:27 pm (UTC)(link)
It's small comfort, but I'll take what I can get.

...For what it's worth, I think there's a better word for you than "wolf".
doitrockapella: (SILHOUETTE ❖ see you next crime)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2013-07-28 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)
"Plámja".

не правда ли, Nietzsche?
doitrockapella: (BACKFLIP ❖ spread these wings of mine)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2013-07-28 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Ask me what I think I am, sometime.

But let's save that for next time.
doitrockapella: (READ ❖ this is not a demyx impression)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2013-07-28 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I always wanted my own dinosaur.

See you next time.