Solf J Kimblee (
explosivecombat) wrote2012-10-04 01:10 am
Entry tags:
NIETZSCHE; DEAD PHILOSOPHERS' INBOX
The offer for conversation is always open, should you desire to take me up on it; I can't guarantee that I'll respond immediately, nor will it necessarily be the response you want, but I'll always respond in some way.
In the name of enlightened discourse.

no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I told you when we started this that I wouldn't be able to provide specifics sometimes, because I don't know. I'll amend the statement to it's possible, but I don't understand how it would be possible.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I imagine it's a fairly short list.
no subject
That isn't an attempt to dodge the question or its implications; the year is still 1915 where I came from, mind you. I don't know what would be necessary.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
We call them chimeras; for some time after I arrived here, I thought the Pokémon might be an example of that, actually.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Say your chimera is a human being with a lion's claws. If you can use alchemy to modify his body into developing claws, is it that much of a stretch to think of making that kind of alteration before birth, such that he'd be born with the propensity to develop claws in the first place?
no subject
Yes, it is - in the case of alchemical alterations, you already have a fully-developed human being to work with.
no subject
True. But in theory, humans and lions are made up of roughly the same materials — carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen. So what is it that makes humans develop fingers, but lions develop claws?
no subject
They're species-specific traits, clearly.
no subject
So we could say, then, that assuming there were such thing as a "blueprint" for forming a human, the human blueprint would call for the trait of fingers but not claws, and the one for lions would call for claws but not fingers. Is that fair?
no subject
I suppose. I don't see why not.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)