explosivecombat: (And what have we here?)
Solf J Kimblee ([personal profile] explosivecombat) wrote2014-10-20 03:32 pm

037. [Text]

I come seeking discussion again today, which to most of you should probably be nothing new; if anything, I ought to apologize for it, but I suspect that will ring about as true as my usual apologies for the subject matter. For what it's worth, the subject is better than it usually is; take that as you will.

I'd like to discuss dreams today; I'm sure those that were here about a year ago know exactly why, but in the end that is neither here nor there, and you don't have to have experienced it to discuss this with me.

I'm sure we're all no strangers to very vivid dreams...? The sort that immerse you so entirely that they almost seem real...surely there are a few qualities here and there that mark them as dreams, but they're disregarded in favor of whatever is actually happening right in front of you. Dreams like that can hardly be said to be different from reality, can they? They invoke feelings within you; they encourage you to continue thinking about them long after you've awakened. You could even say that dreams like that have given you experiences that you might never have had, were you awake – you've gone on adventures and met people and done things that affected you, all while physically being asleep.

Say that there was a way to live like that forever.

Suppose that there's a machine that will put you under, rendering you solidly asleep and allowing you to experience whatever you want. The machine can simulate any pleasurable experience that you choose, instilling all the thoughts and feelings that would come with actually going out and doing those things for yourself in your waking life. There would be no pain or suffering; it would be an experience in pure bliss for as long as you were plugged into the machine.

Again, you could stay that way forever, if you so chose, living out the rest of your life in dreams, and it would be a pleasant experience that's custom-tailored to you. The only tradeoff is that you would be unconscious the entire time; the experience would be entirely in your mind, rather than anything you actually did.

Would you choose to go under and live the rest of your life happy but effectively comatose, or would you prefer to experience life for yourself, entirely awake, with all the imperfections and strife that may come with it?

You can answer me anonymously if you wish, because as usual, your identity doesn't interest me as much as your response does; if you really want to impress me, you'll tell me why you would answer as you did.
silentscales: (paradise)

I think this is the most Snake has said in a single post so far.

[personal profile] silentscales 2014-10-25 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)
We read a lot, says John.

We could be dreaming right now, but it doesn't matter. I think the mind actually gives itself some of the hardest obstacles to overcome in life. It can be damaging, but can we really blame all of our oddities on the situations they came from? Any situation can be traumatic depending on how you react and how your thoughts shape about that event. No matter what is reality and what is fiction or unreal does not matter because it is all based on your view of the world around you. Your world is only as real as you think it is, so you might as well think it to be real and do your best to get the most out of it, says Gaskell.
Edited 2014-10-25 19:14 (UTC)