explosivecombat: (And what have we here?)
Solf J Kimblee ([personal profile] explosivecombat) wrote2014-10-20 03:32 pm

037. [Text]

I come seeking discussion again today, which to most of you should probably be nothing new; if anything, I ought to apologize for it, but I suspect that will ring about as true as my usual apologies for the subject matter. For what it's worth, the subject is better than it usually is; take that as you will.

I'd like to discuss dreams today; I'm sure those that were here about a year ago know exactly why, but in the end that is neither here nor there, and you don't have to have experienced it to discuss this with me.

I'm sure we're all no strangers to very vivid dreams...? The sort that immerse you so entirely that they almost seem real...surely there are a few qualities here and there that mark them as dreams, but they're disregarded in favor of whatever is actually happening right in front of you. Dreams like that can hardly be said to be different from reality, can they? They invoke feelings within you; they encourage you to continue thinking about them long after you've awakened. You could even say that dreams like that have given you experiences that you might never have had, were you awake – you've gone on adventures and met people and done things that affected you, all while physically being asleep.

Say that there was a way to live like that forever.

Suppose that there's a machine that will put you under, rendering you solidly asleep and allowing you to experience whatever you want. The machine can simulate any pleasurable experience that you choose, instilling all the thoughts and feelings that would come with actually going out and doing those things for yourself in your waking life. There would be no pain or suffering; it would be an experience in pure bliss for as long as you were plugged into the machine.

Again, you could stay that way forever, if you so chose, living out the rest of your life in dreams, and it would be a pleasant experience that's custom-tailored to you. The only tradeoff is that you would be unconscious the entire time; the experience would be entirely in your mind, rather than anything you actually did.

Would you choose to go under and live the rest of your life happy but effectively comatose, or would you prefer to experience life for yourself, entirely awake, with all the imperfections and strife that may come with it?

You can answer me anonymously if you wish, because as usual, your identity doesn't interest me as much as your response does; if you really want to impress me, you'll tell me why you would answer as you did.
grapeeater: (the devil.)

[anon text forever]

[personal profile] grapeeater 2014-10-20 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
[Well okay he won't deny that. But he's a little messed up and he knows it.]

I'd prefer it if it were their choice.
grapeeater: (the hermit.)

[personal profile] grapeeater 2014-10-20 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
In the past, it hasn't.

The future is more uncertain, but that person is gone now. So I guess it doesn't matter either way.
grapeeater: (the hanged man.)

[personal profile] grapeeater 2014-10-20 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Because I'm not the sort of person who deserves that sort of thing.
grapeeater: (the chariot.)

[personal profile] grapeeater 2014-10-20 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)
The sort of person who was young and stupid and took on more than he could and got people killed for his blindness.
grapeeater: (Default)

[personal profile] grapeeater 2014-10-20 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes. If I couldn't save everyone, at least I could save someone.

But I ended up saving no one.
grapeeater: (Default)

[personal profile] grapeeater 2014-10-21 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think it's a bad concept. It just needs to be implemented... correctly. And of course, you can never save everyone.
grapeeater: (the hermit.)

[personal profile] grapeeater 2014-10-21 01:46 am (UTC)(link)
No.

[And that... really says it all, doesn't it...]</small
grapeeater: (the fortune.)

[personal profile] grapeeater 2014-10-21 02:33 am (UTC)(link)
No.

I'd say 'well now I know better' but... it was an expensive lesson.