Solf J Kimblee (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
explosivecombat) wrote2014-07-09 07:37 pm
explosivecombat) wrote2014-07-09 07:37 pm
Entry tags:
- !ic,
- **anonymous,
- *text,
- @carmen sandiego (here she is),
- @flynn,
- @greed's poor life choices,
- @hiccup haddock,
- @royce,
- @walter,
- admittedly kind of asking for it,
- being you guys is suffering,
- but is everyone mad about genocide,
- come at me bro,
- engaging in heresy,
- good ideas are clearly relative concepts,
- hell are you even,
- how edgy of you,
- i used to be hardcore,
- just thought he'd ask,
- kimblee is overstimulated,
- like a brick to the face,
- my logic is flawless,
- my social skills are flawless,
- no sense of self-preservation,
- professor of fauxlosophy,
- raid on the city knock out evil tusks,
- sanity is so passé,
- slacking off like hell,
- so fucking flawless,
- surprisingly not plotting anyone's death,
- texting into the void,
- that may have been a bit insensitive,
- that wasn't morbid at all,
- the greater internet fuckwad theory,
- this is really stupid,
- tonight we're going hard,
- well that's needlessly sinister,
- why we can't have nice things,
- with apologies to carmen sandiego
035. [ANON TEXT]
[Well, good evening, network - it seems Seth's device is active again, though at the very least he's not inviting everyone to war like he's throwing the world's most unasked-for party this time around.]
You know, one of the things I've always found most fascinating about human morality is the idea that we're higher beings due to our natural inclination to put others before ourselves. It's generally accepted in society that we should be willing to sacrifice ourselves before harming another; I've always found adhering to that sort of notion to both vaguely admirable and sickeningly saccharine. If you must kill one to save another, that's still a life that's lost; why shouldn't the reward go to the one who's willing to fight for it, rather than the one who did nothing to earn it but sit there in pious devotion to doing nothing wrong?
We claim superiority for suppressing our instincts to survive; if anything, I think that would put us lower than dogs, not above them. All this intelligence and no will to live; it's pitiful.
But then, I suppose my lack of understanding of these things is why I can't be considered one of you.
For the time being, however, say I were to humor you in discussion for a while. Do you think your will to fight to ensure your survival actually needs to be tested? Since I suspect the answer will overwhelmingly be "No," I have another pre-emptive question for the heroic types.
Is there anything outside of arrogance and so-called moral superiority that makes you say so?
[...O...kay that's really not any better but apparently, it's just that kind of night.
You know, full of misanthropy.
Because some nights are like that.]
You know, one of the things I've always found most fascinating about human morality is the idea that we're higher beings due to our natural inclination to put others before ourselves. It's generally accepted in society that we should be willing to sacrifice ourselves before harming another; I've always found adhering to that sort of notion to both vaguely admirable and sickeningly saccharine. If you must kill one to save another, that's still a life that's lost; why shouldn't the reward go to the one who's willing to fight for it, rather than the one who did nothing to earn it but sit there in pious devotion to doing nothing wrong?
We claim superiority for suppressing our instincts to survive; if anything, I think that would put us lower than dogs, not above them. All this intelligence and no will to live; it's pitiful.
But then, I suppose my lack of understanding of these things is why I can't be considered one of you.
For the time being, however, say I were to humor you in discussion for a while. Do you think your will to fight to ensure your survival actually needs to be tested? Since I suspect the answer will overwhelmingly be "No," I have another pre-emptive question for the heroic types.
Is there anything outside of arrogance and so-called moral superiority that makes you say so?
[...O...kay that's really not any better but apparently, it's just that kind of night.
You know, full of misanthropy.
Because some nights are like that.]
no subject
I thought so.
See, there's that idea out there about mad bombers, guys in the movies who go around flinging sticks of dynamite. Reality is, you bomber types are all the same. Fucking cowards.
no subject
Funny, that's what my prison warden thought, too.
That's probably why he felt so comfortable talking about his kids so close to my cell.
no subject
It's a special kind of gutless pussy who goes after little kids. You're too fucking scared to deal with somebody who can fight back.
[See, you can't tell he's bothered at all.]
no subject
no subject
Get the balls to come on out and you'll hear plenty of your own.