explosivecombat: (I suppose that could be equally relevant)
Solf J Kimblee ([personal profile] explosivecombat) wrote 2014-05-13 10:26 pm (UTC)

[...Ah.

It's the sort of thing that Kimblee has a lot of thoughts about, and also the sort of thing that he doesn't talk about if it can be avoided; fortunately enough, as much as he generally lives most of his life out according to the law of Equivalent Exchange, it's not something he adheres to conversationally. Just because Greed seems perfectly content to discuss these things doesn't mean he has to, and it'd be rude to change the subject anyway.

And besides, he likes getting deets and so deets he shall continue to obtain. So just...let him touch on that a bit and promptly go back to ignoring it, if you don't mind, good sir.]


That circumstance is possibly the closest I've gotten to understanding the existential issue I mentioned earlier - it wasn't frightening to me so much as it was disturbing, as though there was some sort of fundamental wrongness to it, but I think I have some understanding of what you mean.

...That's likely my problem with understanding this concept as a whole, though, now that I think about it - I find plenty of things to be disturbing or mildly alarming, but almost nothing so extensive as to constitute a distinct fear.


[...huh. That certainly is a thought that just happened; he's going to file that one away for later, moving right along...]

It sounds as though your master rather had it out for you - was there a particular reason for it, outside of the abovementioned going-rogue issue?

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting