The "why" is that you're confirming something you told me once — I think we were talking about the way we conduct our respective personal and professional lives, and I had a hard time understanding how one could keep the one from bleeding into the other, but you were fairly confident in the distinction. I think I understand a little better now how that works, so I just...wanted to hear it again, really.
So, in another hypothetical Olivine, for example — we have our understanding that if I interfere, I do so assuming the risk of my own actions; you're there doing your job, and for that duration, I'm someone standing in the way of it, so that's how you'll treat me irrespective of everything else.
But once the job has concluded, it stops having bearing on how we interact in your personal life. To put it a little overly flippantly, there wouldn't be any hard feelings. Do I...still have it right?
no subject
So, in another hypothetical Olivine, for example — we have our understanding that if I interfere, I do so assuming the risk of my own actions; you're there doing your job, and for that duration, I'm someone standing in the way of it, so that's how you'll treat me irrespective of everything else.
But once the job has concluded, it stops having bearing on how we interact in your personal life. To put it a little overly flippantly, there wouldn't be any hard feelings. Do I...still have it right?