explosivecombat: (I like the way you think)
Solf J Kimblee ([personal profile] explosivecombat) wrote2014-03-03 03:21 pm

031. [Text]

You know, I've realized that whenever I address the network nowadays, I always include some sort of apology for the morbidity of the subject matter; the subject matter is never any better the next time around, which I think just draws the validity of the apology into question by now. Ah, but that's neither here nor there - the subject today is still, however, not any better, so consider the apology this afternoon as genuine as it always is.

[In other words, sorry-not-sorry. Kimblee...]

I would like to discuss morality today, actually - perhaps befittingly, since there are so many morally dubious individuals around as of late.

Assume for a moment that you come across someone in peril; you're in a secluded area, and no one else is around to help this individual but you. The specific sort of peril they're in doesn't matter, but for the sake of argument, assume that it's something that you can handle easily - assume that assisting them won't kill you, and even if the situation you envision is dangerous you can call the authorities for help and that would be considered "assisting" for the sake of this experiment. For whatever reason, the person in peril cannot save themselves; if you don't do anything, the situation will prove fatal for the person you've come across.

No one will know if you help the person or not. You won't be punished or penalized in any way for not helping them - in other words, you have no legal obligation to do so - but if you don't, the person in peril is going to die. You've never met the person before this moment; there's nothing about their appearance or situation that implies that you should consider them an enemy, but they aren't explicitly a friend or an ally either. Just a random stranger that you are given the option of rescuing.

Most would probably agree that rescuing a person in peril like that is the "right" thing to do; I'm sure some would disagree, either because their beliefs are a bit unorthodox or because they want to feel edgy. So my question isn't necessarily what you believe - my question is why. Can you justify it, or are you just operating under "what feels right"?

Answer me anonymously if you'd like; as usual, your identity doesn't necessarily interest me, but your answer does.
doitrockapella: (ATTITUDE ❖ i'm the motherflippin')

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-03-04 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
Do you think we can keep up this streak of answering each other's questions with another question for very long?
doitrockapella: (FLIRT ❖ catch me if you can)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-03-04 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
Is it solely up to me?
doitrockapella: (DRINK ❖ oh look cobra's talking again)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-03-04 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
All things considered, is giving you control over something ever a good idea?
doitrockapella: (SMUG ❖ smarter than a fifth-grader)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-03-04 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
Since when are you my Fuhrer?
doitrockapella: (POINT ❖ what's yours will soon be mine)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-03-04 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
If I were to ask whether or not you think using a question like that is cheating the game, is your answer going to be "Should I?"
doitrockapella: (BORED ❖ but it's still better than clue)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-03-04 02:01 am (UTC)(link)
Why didn't I see that coming?
doitrockapella: (FLIRT ❖ catch me if you can)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-03-04 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
Why would I be trying to trip you up?
doitrockapella: (ANNOYED ❖ that's so not your color)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-03-04 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
What competitive streak?
doitrockapella: (TCH ❖ just throw ghost pirates at it)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-03-04 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
Now aren't you the one trying to throw me?
doitrockapella: (BANTER ❖ the saddest bunch i ever met)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-03-04 02:23 am (UTC)(link)
Don't you have work you ought to be doing?
doitrockapella: (POINT ❖ what's yours will soon be mine)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2014-03-04 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
Did you miss the sarcasm?

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 02:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 02:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 02:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 02:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 03:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 03:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 03:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 03:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 03:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 03:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 03:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 04:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 05:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 05:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 05:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2014-03-04 05:21 (UTC) - Expand